LOAN
FROM DOMESTIC SOURCES
Issues involved in availing Domestic Loans
In an ongoing project, at times, if the receipt of foreign
fund is delayed then an organisation may have to borrow
from local sources to continue the project. It is understandable
for an organisation to face such circumstances and there
is no specific bar against such transaction under FCRA.
But
in this context the following may be noted: i) If funds from local sources are used for FC projects then
they have to be reflected in the FC books of account. Separate
books of account for FC purposes do not imply that there cannot
be any transactions from the domestic sources.
ii) A loan from domestic sources is not a receipt from foreign
source. Therefore, it should not be received in the designated
bank account. The expenditure can be directly made from the
domestic bank account and booked as expenditure in the FC books
of account. A corresponding liability should also be shown
in the FC books of account.
iii) When the funds are received from foreign sources the
liability can be repaid to the domestic books of account.
iv) The issue arising here is whether such loan taken from
domestic funds should be reflected in FC-3 return. In this
context, we have to understand that FC-3 return wants us to
submit only the analysis of receipt and utilisation of foreign
contribution. Any loan from domestic sources is apparently
not a foreign contribution. Therefore, it should not be reflected
in Form FC-3.
Illustration
For example, an organisation receives 1,00,000.00 in the
year 2001-02 from foreign sources. It spends Rs.1,50,000.00
on FC
projects. It borrows Rs.50,000.00 from domestic sources.
In the year 2002-03, it receives Rs. 1,00,000.00 from foreign
sources. It spends Rs. 50,000.00 on FC projects and repays
Rs. 50,000.00 to domestic account.
In
the above case, in the year 2001-02, the organisation’s
FC books of account should show Rs. 1,50,000.00 as application
of funds. Rs. 50,000.00 should be shown as liability
in the FC Balance Sheet. But, in the FC-3 statement, only
Rs. 1,00,000.00
should be shown as foreign receipts and application to
the extent of Rs. 1,00,000.00 only. Because Form FC-3
requires
a summary of the FC receipts and utilisation of those
receipts. Rs. 50,000.00 may have been utilised for a FC project
but
it
is not an utilisation of FC receipts.
In the year 2002-03, Rs.1,00,000.00 should be shown as
foreign receipts and Rs.50,000.00 should be repaid
to the domestic
books of account and remaining Rs. 50,000.00 should
be shown as utilisation. In FC-3 return, Rs. 1,00,000.00
should be
shown as utilisation.
The above illustration may raise some confusion regarding
non-reflection of Rs. 50,000.00 as utilisation in
the FC-3 return, in the
year 2001-02. Here we have to understand that FC-3
is not a statement to be prepared on accounting principles
rather
it
is a statement declaring certain specific facts as
per
the requirement of FCRA. The requirement is specifically
to mention
inflow and utilisation of foreign funds in a particular
year. Therefore, the expenditure of Rs. 50,000.00
from domestic
sources should not be considered for FC-3 purposes
till the foreign
funds are received against it. Suppose, the organisation
does not receive any foreign funds in future then
such reflection would not be correct. Therefore, any
expenditure
on expectation
of a future receipt cannot be considered as an application
of foreign funds because it is a contingent upon
a future event.
The other issue pertinent is repayment of Rs. 50,000.00
in the year 2002-03 being shown as utilisation
in 2002-03 for
FC-3 purposes. Though, the actual expenditure was
incurred in the year 2001-02. In this context,
it may be noted
that, firstly, for FCRA purposes, the foreign funds
were received
and utilized in the year 2002-03. Till the receipt
of foreign funds, utilisation was made from domestic
sources,
therefore,
not within the purview of FCRA. Secondly, for the
purposes of understanding the legal sanctity of
such transactions.
Because, under the prevailing laws repayment of
loan for earlier year
expenditures are considered as valid utilisation
in the current year. Finally, we should always
remember that
Form FC-3 is
prepared for reporting purposes on the specific
and statutory requirement of FCRA.
A loan from domestic sources is not a FC receipt,
therefore, it should not be shown in the FC receipt
and payment
account also. The loan should be directly shown
as a liability in
the balance sheet and the FC income and expenditure
account should
show excess of expenditure over income to that
extent. To sum up, a loan from domestic source
will not be
reflected in the
FC-3 as well as FC receipt and payment account
and the procedure
as discussed above should be followed.
Overall Summary
To sum up the discussions : (i) An organisation may use funds from domestic sources for
FC projects.
(ii) A loan from domestic sources is not a receipt from foreign
source. Therefore, it should not be received in the designated
bank account. The expenditure can be directly made from the
domestic bank account and booked as expenditure in the FC books
of account. A corresponding liability should also be shown
in the FC books of account.
(iii) When the funds are received from foreign sources the
liability can be repaid to the domestic books of account.
(iv) Any loan from domestic sources is apparently not a foreign
contribution. Therefore, it should not be reflected in Form
FC-3 and FC receipt and payment account.
|