THE FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) BILL, 2006
Preface
The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Bill, 2006 was introduced in Rajya
Sabha on 18th December, 2006.
It was passed on to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs
for examination.
The Committee issued a press communiqué on 09th February, 2007
inviting views/suggestions on the Bill to which the Committee received
a large number of memoranda.
The Committee held meetings with the Home Secretary, Govt. of India,
and various Representative Organizations. It has come up with a draft
report by taking clause-by-clause representation of the Bill.
Observations/Recommendations
The observations/Recommendations of the Standing Committee on the Bill
are reproduced below:
|
In
the Bill, the definition of “Foreign Source” includes
Indian Companies with more than fifty percent of foreign holding.
The Representative Organizations had requested for the exclusion
of such Companies from the definition of Foreign Source. It
has been upheld by the Committee as well since such foreign
holding
is permissible under FDI and FII norms. |
|
The
Committee has also recommended that Municipal Councils and Panchayati
Raj Institutions should be covered in the definition of “Legislature” |
|
The
Bill prohibits Foreign Contribution receipts in certain cases and
at the same time also specifies Foreign Contribution receipts which
are exempt from such prohibitions.
The
Representative Organizations as well as the Committee has noted
that the Bill does not specifically exclude the receipt of
foreign scholarship or stipend by Indian citizens studying
in India or
foreign academic institutions, from the prohibitions contained
in the Bill. The FCRA Act, 1976 had specific provisions in
this regard. The Committee has recommended an amendment
in the Bill
so that it specifically excludes the foreign scholarship receipts
from such prohibitions. |
|
The
Bill prohibits organizations of a Political nature from accepting
Foreign Contribution. The power to declare an Organization to
be one of a Political nature rests with the Central Government.
The
organization so declared may make a representation to Central
Government within thirty days from the date of notice, giving
reasons as to
why it should not be declared an organization of Political nature.
However, the Bill does not put any time-limit on Central Government
by which they have to settle the representation. Also, there
is no provision in the Bill that gives an organization a right
to
appeal against the decision of Central Government.
The
Representative Organizations have therefore asked for the time
bound post-decisional
hearing after an organization is declared to
be one of a Political nature. The Committee has recommended that
a provision to appeal against decision given by Central Government
in
this regard be inserted and a time frame may be provided within
which the Government has to take a decision in the cases where
a representation
is made by the organization. |
|
The
Bill prohibits acceptance of any Foreign Hospitality by member
of a Legislature or a Judge or an office-bearer of a Political
party or a Government Employee or employee of any other body
controlled by Government, except with prior permission.
The
Committee has recommended for a more clear definition on “Foreign Hospitality” which
should state the status of person, i.e., in official or personal capacity. The
Committee has therefore suggested that the words “when on official visit” should
be added after the words “a person” in the definition of “Foreign
Hospitality”. Likewise, the restriction on accepting foreign hospitality
should apply when one is travelling to a foreign country in one’s official
capacity. |
|
Regarding
the prohibition imposed by the Bill on the transfer of foreign
contribution to other non-registered persons, the Committee has
recommended that to safeguard the interests of the smaller NGOs
working in the remotest parts of the country, there should be a
provision by which the larger or mother NGO can seek permission
and clearance for transfer of funds to smaller organizations and
thereby exempt the smaller NGOs from registration or seeking prior
approval. |
|
The
Bill restricts the use of Foreign Contribution on Administrative
purposes to the extent of fifty percent. The concerns were raised
by Representative Organizations regarding definition of “Administrative
expenses” and the ceiling of fifty percent on utilization
of funds for administrative expenses. The Committee has recommended
that the term “Administrative Expenses” be clearly
defined. However, it has endorsed the ceiling of fifty percent
to meet administrative expenses. |
|
The
RBI has suggested that the cancellation of permission to receive
foreign contribution may be advised through the website of the
Ministry of Home affairs to avoid any delay in communication in
this regard. The Ministry has agreed to consider the suggestion
at the time of framing the rules. |
|
One
major concern raised by the Representative Organizations was that
the Bill does not prescribe any time limit by which the Central
Government has to dispose of an application for registration or
prior permission. Also, the Bill requires the Certificate of registration
to be renewed after every five years and an application for renewal
should be made within six months before the expiry of period of
certificate. However, no provision is made for the scenario where
application for renewal is submitted but no intimation is received
about renewal or refusal by the expiry date.
This has been dealt with in detail and the Committee has recommended
that a period of ninety days may ordinarily be fixed for
taking a decision on grant of certificate
or giving prior permission. In case of delay, beyond the normal period of
ninety days, the Central Government should record the reasons
for delay. Likewise, the
time limit of ninety days from the date of application made may be fixed
for renewal of registration. |
|
The
Bill requires the Bank or Authorised persons to report to Specified
Authority about the amount of Foreign Remittance, Source of Receipt
and other particulars. The Committee has recommended that a threshold
limit of Rs.10 lakhs be fixed for reporting by banks. |
|
The
Committee has noted that Sec177 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) prescribes
a simple punishment of Rs.1000 or imprisonment for a term which
may extend to six months, to a person who furnishes false information
to a Public Servant. In case a false statement on oath is given
to a Public Servant, Section 181 of IPC prescribes punishment which
may extend to 3 years and shall also be liable to fine. The Committee
has recommended that the provisions of Offences and Penalties be
brought in line with the said sections of IPC. |
Sk/FMSF/91208
|