LOAN
FROM DOMESTIC SOURCES
Issues
involved in availing Domestic Loans
In
an ongoing project, at times, if the receipt of foreign fund
is delayed then an organisation may have to borrow from
local sources to continue the project. It is understandable
for an organisation to face such circumstances and there
is no specific bar against such transaction under FCRA. But
in this context the following may be noted:
i) If funds from local sources are used for FC projects then they have
to be reflected in the FC books of account. Separate books of account
for FC purposes do not imply that there cannot be any transactions from
the domestic sources.
ii) A loan from domestic sources is not a receipt from foreign source.
Therefore, it should not be received in the designated bank account.
The expenditure can be directly made from the domestic bank account and
booked as expenditure in the FC books of account. A corresponding liability
should also be shown in the FC books of account.
iii) When the funds are received from foreign sources the liability can
be repaid to the domestic books of account.
iv) The issue arising here is whether such loan taken from domestic funds
should be reflected in FC-3 return. In this context, we have to understand
that FC-3 return wants us to submit only the analysis of receipt and
utilisation of foreign contribution. Any loan from domestic sources is
apparently not a foreign contribution. Therefore, it should not be reflected
in Form FC-3.
Illustration
For
example, an organisation receives 1,00,000.00 in the year
2001-02 from foreign sources. It spends Rs.1,50,000.00
on FC projects. It borrows Rs.50,000.00 from domestic sources.
In the year 2002-03, it receives Rs. 1,00,000.00 from foreign
sources. It spends Rs. 50,000.00 on FC projects and repays
Rs. 50,000.00 to domestic account.
In
the above case, in the year 2001-02, the organisation’s
FC books of account should show Rs. 1,50,000.00 as application
of funds. Rs. 50,000.00 should be shown as liability in the
FC Balance Sheet. But, in the FC-3 statement, only Rs. 1,00,000.00
should be shown as foreign receipts and application to the
extent of Rs. 1,00,000.00 only. Because Form FC-3 requires
a summary of the FC receipts and utilisation of those receipts.
Rs. 50,000.00 may have been utilised for a FC project but
it is not an utilisation of FC receipts.
In
the year 2002-03, Rs.1,00,000.00 should be shown as foreign
receipts and Rs.50,000.00 should be repaid to the domestic
books of account and remaining Rs. 50,000.00 should be shown
as utilisation. In FC-3 return, Rs. 1,00,000.00 should be
shown as utilisation.
The
above illustration may raise some confusion regarding non-reflection
of Rs. 50,000.00 as utilisation in the FC-3 return, in the
year 2001-02. Here we have to understand that FC-3 is not
a statement to be prepared on accounting principles rather
it is a statement declaring certain specific facts as per
the requirement of FCRA. The requirement is specifically
to mention inflow and utilisation of foreign funds in a particular
year. Therefore, the expenditure of Rs. 50,000.00 from domestic
sources should not be considered for FC-3 purposes till the
foreign funds are received against it. Suppose, the organisation
does not receive any foreign funds in future then such reflection
would not be correct. Therefore, any expenditure on expectation
of a future receipt cannot be considered as an application
of foreign funds because it is a contingent upon a future
event.
The
other issue pertinent is repayment of Rs. 50,000.00 in the
year 2002-03 being shown as utilisation in 2002-03 for FC-3
purposes. Though, the actual expenditure was incurred in
the year 2001-02. In this context, it may be noted that,
firstly, for FCRA purposes, the foreign funds were received
and utilized in the year 2002-03. Till the receipt of foreign
funds, utilisation was made from domestic sources, therefore,
not within the purview of FCRA. Secondly, for the purposes
of understanding the legal sanctity of such transactions.
Because, under the prevailing laws repayment of loan for
earlier year expenditures are considered as valid utilisation
in the current year. Finally, we should always remember that
Form FC-3 is prepared for reporting purposes on the specific
and statutory requirement of FCRA.
A
loan from domestic sources is not a FC receipt, therefore,
it should not be shown in the FC receipt and payment account
also. The loan should be directly shown as a liability in
the balance sheet and the FC income and expenditure account
should show excess of expenditure over income to that extent.
To sum up, a loan from domestic source will not be reflected
in the FC-3 as well as FC receipt and payment account and
the procedure as discussed above should be followed.
Overall
Summary
To
sum up the discussions :
(i) An organisation may use funds from domestic sources for FC projects.
(ii) A loan from domestic sources is not a receipt from foreign source.
Therefore, it should not be received in the designated bank account.
The expenditure can be directly made from the domestic bank account and
booked as expenditure in the FC books of account. A corresponding liability
should also be shown in the FC books of account.
(iii) When the funds are received from foreign sources the liability
can be repaid to the domestic books of account.
(iv) Any loan from domestic sources is apparently not a foreign contribution.
Therefore, it should not be reflected in Form FC-3 and FC receipt and
payment account.
|